Umoja v. BezioUmoja v. Bezio
After a search of his cell revealed a letter from another inmate highlighting the importance of a chain of command and the use of caution when recruiting other prisoners into a particular gang, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits possession of gang-related materials. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and a penalty was imposed. The determination was upheld on administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this
We confirm. The confiscated letter, misbehavior report and testimony from the authoring correction officers, both of whom were trained in the identification of gang-related materials, provide substantial evidence of petitioner‘s guilt (see Matter of Sweat v Fischer, 52 AD3d 1142, 1142 [2008]). Contrary to petitioner‘s assertions, he was not entitled to hear confidential testimony regarding the ongoing investigation that led to the search of his cell (see Matter of Rickson v Leclaire, 46 AD3d 1050, 1051 [2007]; Matter of Tusa v Goord, 287 AD2d 907, 908 [2001], appeal dismissed 98 NY2d 646 [2002]), and the misbehavior report “provided identifying information and the factual basis for the charge [ ] with sufficient particularity to allow [him] to prepare a defense” (Matter of Maya v Goord, 272 AD2d 724,
Mercure, J.P., Lahtinen, Kane, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.