Rickson v. LeclaireRickson v. Leclaire
At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of harassment and a temporary release violation. The determination was affirmed on administrative review and this
We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and the confidential testimony considered by the Hearing Officer in camera (see Matter of Shicon v Goord, 27 AD3d 811, 811-812 [2006]). Petitioner‘s testimony attempting to explain his conduct
Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.