State v. SudderthState v. Sudderth
Dated: July 8, 2009
DICKINSON, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
{¶1} While coming home from a bowling alley, Brian Sudderth allegedly pinned Michelle Miller down in the front seat of a pickup truck and began striking her in the face. His blows broke Ms. Miller‘s nose and pushed her left eyeball down through the bone that forms the bottom of the eye socket. The Grand Jury indicted him for domestic violence and felonious assault, and a jury convicted him of domestic violence and aggravated assault. The trial court sentenced him to seventeen months in prison. Mr. Sudderth has appealed, arguing that the State failed to prove venue or that he and Ms. Miller were household members and that the evidence shows he only hit Ms. Miller in self defense. This Court affirms because there was sufficient evidence to convict Mr. Sudderth of aggravated assault and domestic violence, and his convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
{¶2} On the evening of August 27, 2007, Mr. Sudderth and Ms. Miller went out to a bar then to a bowling alley. They drank throughout the evening and, because they were heavily intoxicated when they left the bowling alley, one of Mr. Sudderth‘s friends drove them home. By the time they got to the apartment building where they lived, Ms. Miller had two black eyes and a broken nose. A neighbor who learned of her condition took her into his house and called 911.
{¶3} Officer Joseph Storad was the first officer dispatched to the neighbor‘s house. He said he spoke to Ms. Miller, who told him that Mr. Sudderth and she had started arguing at the bowling alley. She told him that, on the way home, she was sitting in the front passenger seat of a pickup truck and Mr. Sudderth was in the back seat. She said that, as they were driving, their argument got heated. Mr. Sudderth climbed over the back seat, pinned her against the front passenger door, and punched her in the face multiple times. Ms. Miller later told a different officer and an emergency medical technician that Mr. Sudderth had hit her numerous times. A doctor who treated her at the hospital testified that it was unlikely that a single punch could have done so much damage to her face.
{¶4} At trial, Ms. Miller testified that she provoked Mr. Sudderth. She said she got angry at him because he was ignoring her at the bowling alley. According to her, she started nagging him, leading to their argument. Because she had been drinking, she started “acting crazy” during the drive home. She said she tried to climb into the back seat where Mr. Sudderth was sitting to slap and bite him. She bit the driver of the truck when he tried to separate them. She said she had bitten Mr. Sudderth in the past, sometimes so hard that she caused scarring. She also said that, after Mr. Sudderth punched her one time in the face, she let go of him and
{¶5} The Grand Jury indicted Mr. Sudderth for felonious assault and domestic violence. At trial, the court also gave an instruction on aggravated assault, and the jury convicted Mr. Sudderth of aggravated assault and domestic violence. Mr. Sudderth has appealed his convictions, assigning two errors.
SUFFICIENCY
{¶6} Mr. Sudderth‘s first assignment of error is that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of aggravated assault and domestic violence. He has argued that the State failed to prove that the offenses occurred in Summit County or that he and Ms. Miller were “family or household member[s].” He has also argued that the court should have granted his motions for acquittal.
{¶7} Under
{¶9} Officer Storad testified that Ms. Miller told him the argument started at a bowling alley in Springfield Township. From his conversations with Ms. Miller and Mr. Sudderth, he learned the incident “happened inside a truck on State Route 224 and 77 and continued back to the house.” Officer Chris Rhoades said he responded to the 911 call as backup and drove to the house where Ms. Miller was located. When the prosecutor asked Officer Rhoades where the house was located in Summit County, the officer answered “Coventry Township.”
{¶10} The State presented sufficient circumstantial evidence that the aggravated assault and domestic violence offenses occurred in Summit County. Furthermore, even if there is a question about where the offenses occurred,
{¶11} Regarding Mr. Sudderth‘s argument that there was no evidence that Ms. Miller and he were family or household members,
{¶12} Officer Storad testified that Mr. Sudderth told him that Ms. Miller and he were living together and that she had been his girlfriend for three years. Ms. Miller confirmed that she was Mr. Sudderth‘s girlfriend and that she was on the lease where Mr. Sudderth and another man lived. She said she got upset with Mr. Sudderth at the bowling alley because other couples “were all together being cozy, and he‘s all up running around wanting to talk to everybody.”
MANIFEST WEIGHT
{¶13} Mr. Sudderth‘s second assignment of error is that his convictions were against the manifest weight of the evidence. When a defendant argues that his convictions are against the manifest weight of the evidence, this Court “must review the entire record, weigh the evidence and all reasonable inferences, consider the credibility of witnesses and determine whether, in resolving conflicts in the evidence, the trier of fact clearly lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the conviction[s] must be reversed and a new trial ordered.” State v. Otten, 33 Ohio App. 3d 339, 340 (1986).
{¶14} Mr. Sudderth has argued that the evidence showed that Ms. Miller was the primary aggressor and that he struck her in self-defense. He has also argued that the police should have done more investigation. In particular, he has argued that they should have taken photographs of the truck in which the incident occurred and followed up with Ms. Miller about whether what she said while she was intoxicated was accurate.
{¶15} Although Ms. Miller testified at trial that she attacked Mr. Sudderth, the jury could have found that the physical evidence correlated more closely with what she told the police on the night of the incident. While Ms. Miller said at trial that Mr. Sudderth hit her one time, the doctor who treated her at the hospital opined that he could not have generated enough force to cause a blowout fracture to the floor of Ms. Miller‘s eye socket and break the bones in her nose with only one punch. The jury, therefore, reasonably could have determined that what Ms. Miller told police after the incident was more credible than what she said at trial. It did not lose
CONCLUSION
{¶16} Mr. Sudderth‘s convictions of aggravated assault and domestic violence are supported by sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The judgment of the Summit County Common Pleas Court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
There were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
We order that a special mandate issue out of this Court, directing the Court of Common Pleas, County of Summit, State of Ohio, to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this journal entry shall constitute the mandate, pursuant to
Immediately upon the filing hereof, this document shall constitute the journal entry of judgment, and it shall be file stamped by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals at which time the period for review shall begin to run.
Costs taxed to appellant.
CLAIR E. DICKINSON
FOR THE COURT
MOORE, P. J.
CONCUR
APPEARANCES:
RONALD T. GATTS, attorney at law, for appellant.
SHERRI BEVAN WALSH, prosecuting attorney, and RICHARD S. KASAY, assistant prosecuting attorney, for appellee.