State v. Modeen, 28 Ohio St. 3d 64

*65The judgment in this cause (case Nos. 85AP-907 and 85AP-908) has been certified to this court as being in conflict with the judgment of the court in State v. Meadows (Dec. 18, 1985), Hamilton App. No. C-850091, unreported, on the following issue: “Does the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibit the state of Ohio from enacting a criminal statute which prohibits the private possession of child pornography?”

Based on State v. Meadows (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 43, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Celebrezze, C.J., Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Sweeney, J., not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Modeen

Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court

Date Published: Dec 24, 1986

Citations: 28 Ohio St. 3d 64; 502 N.E.2d 634; 28 Ohio B. 164; 1986 Ohio LEXIS 794; No. 86-1148

Docket Number: No. 86-1148

Court Abbreviation: Ohio