Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

---

Dissenting Opinion

Mr. Justice Harlan,

dissenting.

In my opinion the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, should be given retroactive application is deserving of plenary consideration. Cf. my dissenting opinion in LaVallee v. Durocher, 377 U. S. 998.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Crouse

Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Published: Jun 22, 1964

Citations: 378 U.S. 584; 84 S. Ct. 1929; 12 L. Ed. 2d 1039; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 873; No. 915, Misc.

Docket Number: No. 915, Misc.

Court Abbreviation: U.S.