History
  • No items yet
midpage
LaVallee v. Durocher
377 U.S. 998
SCOTUS
1964
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.






Dissenting Opinion

Mr. Justice Harlan,

dissenting.

I believe that the issue in this case has an importance which justifies departure from my usual practice of not noting a dissent to a denial of certiorari with which I do not agree. The issue is whether this Court’s holding in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335, is required to be given retroactive effect. That question-, which is of continuing concern in the administration of criminal justice in a substantial number of States, deserves plenary consideration by this Court, which it has not yet had. See my dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U. S. 2, 3.

I would grant certiorari and set the case for argument.

Case Details

Case Name: LaVallee v. Durocher
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 22, 1964
Citation: 377 U.S. 998
Docket Number: No. 1109
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.