Smith v. BuckmanSmith v. Buckman
- Reporters:
- , ,
This is аn action in ejectment brought hy the respondents, who were plаintiffs below, against the appellants, to recover a parcel of land, containing abоut six .acres, which the respondеnts allege is a part of the dоnation land claim of John Dodd аnd H. E. Dodd, of which they are the owners hy reason of certain mesne conveyances from the оriginal donees to themselves. Answering the complaint, the appellants denied ownership in the respondents, and pleaded affirmatively matter constituting an estоppel, and adverse pоssession during the period of statutе of limitations. The verdict of the jury wаs in favor of the respondents.
*300Thе principal contention is over the question whether the evidеnce is sufficient to justify the verdict. Wе have carefully examined thе record, and find that there was a substantial conflict in the testimony on all of the issues made. In such cаses this court will not disturb the verdict of thе jury. Pronqer v. Old National Bank, 20 Wash. 618 (56 Pac. 391).
Exceptions were taken tо the admission of. certain evidence, and to the refusal of thе court to give certain requested instructions to the jury. That part of the evidence to which exception might properly lie was stricken out by the court on motion of the appellants, and thе jury were instructed to disregard it. If it was error originally to admit the testimony, the error was cured by the action of the court in striking it out. The charge of the court was full and clear, and covered the entire law of the case. Such of the rеquested instructions as were proper were given, substantially, and thе charge as a whole was аs favorable to the appellants as the law of the case warranted.
The judgment is affirmed.