midpage

Silver v. United StatesSilver v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 25, 2021
20-60
Versions:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS joins, dissenting from denial of certiorari.

Normally, extortion and bribery are treated as distinct crimes. In Evans v. United States, 504 U. S. 255 (1992), however, this Court conflated them for purposes of the Hobbs Act when a public official is the defendant. Id., at 260. Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Scalia, THOMAS, and BREYER have all questioned that judgment. See id., at 278 (THOMAS, J., joined by Rehnquist, C. J., and Scalia, J., dissenting); Ocasio v. United States, 578 U. S. ___, ___ (2016) (BREYER, J., concurring) (slip op., at 1); id., at ___–___ (THOMAS, J., dissenting) (slip op., at 1–2). I would have granted this case to reconsider Evans in light of these thoughtful criticisms.

Case Details

Case Name: Silver v. United States
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 25, 2021
Citations: 141 S.Ct. 656; 20-60
Docket Number: 20-60
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
Log In
    Silver v. United States, 141 S.Ct. 656