Perez-Hernandez v. M. Marte Auto Corp.Perez-Hernandez v. M. Marte Auto Corp.
Plaintiff established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability by showing that he was crossing the street within the crosswalk, with the light in his favor, when defendants’ vehicle struck him while making a left turn (see Beamud v Gray, 45 AD3d 257 [1st Dept 2007]). Defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to comparative negligence. Plaintiff testified that he looked both ways before crossing the street, and he could not have avoided the accident given his testimony that he noticed the car moments before being struck (see Kirchgaessner v Hernandez, 40 AD3d 437 [1st Dept 2007]).
Plaintiff also established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of threshold injury under
We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.