Beamud v. GrayBeamud v. Gray
Plaintiffs made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating they were crossing the street, within the crosswalk, with the light in their favor, when they were struck by defendant’s vehicle, which was making a left turn (see Hoey v City of New York, 28 AD3d 717 [2006]; Zabusky v Cochran, 234 AD2d 542 [1996]). Defendant’s unsupported speculation as to plaintiffs’ alleged comparative negligence was insufficient to raise an issue of fact (see Jermin v APA Truck Leasing Co., 237 AD2d 255 [1997]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Marlow and Buckley, JJ.