People v. WilliamsPeople v. Williams
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the testimony of a police detective impermissibly bolstered the complainant’s identification testimony is unpreserved for appellate review (see
Furthermore, the defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Taylor, 1 NY3d 174, 176 [2003]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713 [1998]; People v Smith, 48 AD3d 489 [2008]).
Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Eng, JJ., concur.