People v. FaganPeople v. Fagan
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor impermissibly vouched for the credibility of two confidential informant witnesses who testified pursuant to cooperation agreements, or improperly bolstered their testimony, is unpreserved for appellate review (see
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.