People v. WilliamsPeople v. Williams
Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon
We affirm. Defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as the record does not reflect that he made an appropriate motion to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v Jenkins, 130 AD3d 1091, 1091 [2015]; People v Wilson, 126 AD3d 1143, 1143 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 1078 [2015]). Further, we reject defendant’s contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive. Given defendant’s criminal history and the fact that the sentence imposed was well below the maximum sentence that defendant could have received, we discern no extraordinary circumstances or abuse of discretion warranting a modification of the sentence (see People v Mosley, 87 AD3d 1179, 1179 [2011]; People v McPherson, 76 AD3d 1117, 1117 [2010]).
Peters, P.J., Garry, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.