People v. WilsonPeople v. Wilson
We affirm. Defendant‘s contention that he did not receive the effective assistance of counsel is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as the record fails to indicate that defendant made an appropriate postallocution motion (see People v Moses, 110 AD3d 1118, 1118 [2013]; People v Stroman 107 AD3d 1023, 1025 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1046 [2013]). To the extent that his claims address matters outside of the record, they are
Peters, P.J., Lahtinen and Lynch, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.