People v. WhitePeople v. White
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, following a bench trial, of rape in the first degree (
Also contrary to defendant‘s contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Although the victim‘s testimony contains inconsistencies, it cannot be said that the victim‘s version of events was “manifestly untrue, physically impossible, contrary to experience, or self-contradictory” (People v Stroman, 83 AD2d 370, 373 [1981] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Shedrick, 104 AD2d 263, 274 [1984], affd 66 NY2d 1015 [1985], rearg denied 67 NY2d 758 [1986]). As County Court noted in rendering its verdict, this was “a case of credibility,” and the court‘s determination in this bench trial to credit the victim‘s testimony is entitled to great deference (see generally People v Catlin, 41 AD3d 1199 [2007]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Smith, Fahey and Pine, JJ.