People v. StubbsPeople v. Stubbs
Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of murder in the second degree (
Defendant‘s objection with respect to the cross-examination of a defense witness by the People was sustained, and defendant failed to request a curative instruction with respect to that testimony. Defendant thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court erred in failing to give a curative instruction (see generally People v Rogers, 70 AD3d 1340, 1340 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 892 [2010], cert denied 562 US —, 131 S Ct 475 [2010]). In any event, defendant‘s contention lacks merit.
By failing to request that the court give an expanded charge on identification, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the court erred in failing to do so (see generally
We further conclude, however, that the record establishes that defendant is a predicate felon and that the People failed to file the requisite predicate felony offender statement. The court therefore sentenced defendant as a first violent felony offender. “When it became apparent at sentencing that defendant had a prior felony conviction, the People were required to file a second felony offender statement in accordance with
Same memorandum as in People v Stubbs (96 AD3d 1448 [2012]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Carni and Lindley, JJ.