People v. SloanePeople v. Sloane
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent rеview of the weight of thе evidence (see
The defendant‘s claim of inеffective assistance of counsel is based on matter dehors the record and, thеrefore, cannоt be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v LeGrady, 50 AD3d 1059 [2008]; People v Shemack, 46 AD3d 582 [2007]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Hobson, 43 AD3d 1179 [2007]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Prudenti, P.J., Dillon, Covello and Leventhal, JJ., concur.