THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v SHAWN SHEMACK, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department
845 N.Y.S.2d 914
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, the record clearly establishes that his plea of guilty “‘represent[ed] a voluntary and intelligent choice among alternative courses of action open to [him]‘” (People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 545 [2007], quoting People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 403 [1995]).
The defendant‘s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is based on matter dehors the record and, therefore, cannot be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Hernandez, 44 AD3d 684 [2007]; People v Maize, 40 AD3d 884 [2007]).
The defendant‘s remaining contention is without merit.
Crane, J.P., Rivera, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
