People v. Simon, 34 A.D.3d 852

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant‘s contention that the prosecutor committed misconduct during summation is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v LaValle, 3 NY3d 88, 114 [2004]; People v Harris, 98 NY2d 452, 459 [2002]; People v Dien, 77 NY2d 885, 886 [1991]). In any event, the contention is without merit since the challenged remarks either were fair comment on the evidence, permissible rhetorical comment, or responsive to the defense counsel‘s summation (see People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105, 110 [1976]; People v Garner, 27 AD3d 764 [2006]). Adams, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Simon

Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date Published: Nov 28, 2006

Citations: 34 A.D.3d 852; 823 N.Y.S.2d 906

Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.