midpage

People v. DienPeople v. Dien

New York Court of Appeals
Mar 21, 1991
Versions:77 N.Y.2d 885
571 N.E.2d 69
568 N.Y.S.2d 899
1991 N.Y. LEXIS 309

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant’s sole argument on appeal is that a specific comment made by the prosecutor during summation violated his rights to a fair trial by an impartial jury and to equal protection under the law. At the time of the prosecutor’s statement, however, defendant made only a general objection, thus failing to preserve his argument for this Court’s review (see, People v Rivera, 73 NY2d 941, 942; People v Ford, 69 NY2d 775, 776).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Dien
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 21, 1991
Citations: 77 N.Y.2d 885; 571 N.E.2d 69; 568 N.Y.S.2d 899; 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 309
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In