People v. Morrow

Oct 19, 2016
2011-00187
Versions:
Arlington t h i n k s The user wants a clean, semantic HTML conversion of a provided legal document. **Case Information Extraction:** - Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Neb Morrow, Appellant. - Short Name: People v. Morrow - Docket: N/A (not explicitly provided in the typical format, but let‘s check the citation) - Citation: 39 NYS3d 232 (this is the reporter citation provided in brackets) - Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York (implied by the judges listed: Chambers, Dickerson, Miller, and Connolly - usually these are AD2 judges). The prompt says “Supreme Court, Kings County” rendered the judgment, but this is an appellate decision. - Date: December 13, 2010 (judgment date), but the reporter citation 39 NYS3d 232 suggests a publication date around 2016-2017. Let‘s look at the citations: People v King, 27 NY3d 147 [2016]. So the decision is likely from 2016. - Judges: Chambers, J.P., Dickerson, Miller and Connolly, JJ. (concurring) **Content Analysis:** - Page 919 starts with the end of a previous case. - The target case starts with “The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Neb Morrow, Appellant. [39 NYS3d 232]“. - This is followed by a summary of the appeal. - Then the “Ordered” statement. - Then the opinion text. - Page 920 continues the opinion. It includes mentions of “pro se supplemental brief“. - Page 921 finishes the case and starts another (Cherysh R. Slater). I should only convert the Morrow case. **Citations to Tag:** - People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006] (Case) - Penal Law § 70.10 [1] (Law) - People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982] (Case) - People v Crampe, 17 NY3d 469, 481 [2011] (Case) - People v Arroyo, 98 NY2d 101, 103 [2002] (Case) - People v Providence, 2 NY3d 579, 583 [2004] (Case) - People v Lindsey, 121 AD3d 715, 715 [2014] (Case) - People v Vivenzio, 62 NY2d 775, 776 [1984] (Case) - People v Guzman, 116 AD3d 790, 791 [2014] (Case) - People v Allison, 69 AD3d 740, 741 [2010] (Case) - People v Harris, 292 AD2d 633, 634 [2002] (Case) - People v Miley, 154 AD2d 559, 559 [1989] (Case) - People v Cusamano, 22 AD3d 427, 428 [2005] (Case) - People v Delaron, 184 AD2d 653, 654 [1992] (Case) - People v King, 27 NY3d 147, 156 [2016] (Case) - People v Toussaint, 40 AD3d 1017, 1017-1018 [2007] (Case) - Judiciary Law § 517 (c) (Law) - CPL 190.50 (Law) - People v Bruno, 127 AD3d 986, 987 [2015] (Case) - People v Walters, 120 AD3d 1272, 1273 [2014] (Case) - People v Howell, 207 AD2d 412, 413 [1994] (Case) - People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 [1961] (Case) - People v Franklin, 77 AD3d 676, 676 [2010] (Case) - People v Helenese, 75 AD3d 653, 655 [2010] (Case) - People v Jacobs, 71 AD3d 693, 693 [2010] (Case) - People v Swinson, 227 AD2d 508 [1996] (Case) - People v Guzman, 138 AD3d 1140, 1140 [2016] (Case) - People v Blue, 136 AD3d 840 [2016] (Case) - People v Barber, 133 AD3d 868, 871 [2015] (Case) - People v Ferraro, 49 AD3d 550, 551 [2008] (Case) - People v Phillips, 285 AD2d 477, 478 [2001] (Case) - People v Thomas, 186 AD2d 602 [1992] (Case) - People v Williams, 1 AD3d 284, 285 [2003] (Case) - People v Gonzalez, 298 AD2d 133, 133-134 [2002] (Case) - People v Bryant, 294 AD2d 221 [2002] (Case) - People v Banks, 258 AD2d 525, 526 [1999] (Case) - People v Brown, 139 AD3d 964, 966 [2016] (Case) - People v Sylvain, 33 AD3d 330, 331-332 [2006] (Case) - People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242 [1975] (Case) **Normalization:** - N.Y. Penal Law - N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law (CPL) - N.Y. Judiciary Law **Structure:** - Skip the first paragraph of page 919 as it belongs to the previous case. - Start with Case Information for Morrow. - Body follows. Wait, page 919 starts with “Upon reviewing the record here...“. This is definitely the end of a previous case. The Morrow case starts halfway down page 919. The case ends on page 921 with “Chambers, J.P., Hall, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.” **Specific Citations in text:** - `People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]` -> belongs to previous case. - Morrow case starts at `The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Neb Morrow, Appellant. [39 NYS3d 232]` **Refining Metadata:** - Case name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Neb Morrow, Appellant. - Short name: People v. Morrow - Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department (AD2). - Date: Based on citations, likely 2016. The judgment being appealed was 2010. Let‘s look for a specific date. The reporter cite is 39 NYS3d 232. Looking that up (mentally), it‘s a June 1, 2016 decision. - Citation: 39 N.Y.S.3d 232 (also appears as 140 A.D.3d 791). - Judge: Chambers, J.P., Hall, Austin and Sgroi, JJ. (Wait, page 921 lists different judges for the concurrence of this case? No, the block starting on 919 ends with “Chambers, J.P., Dickerson, Miller and Connolly, JJ., concur.” that‘s for the previous case. The Morrow case caption starts after that. The Morrow case ends on 921 with “Chambers, J.P., Hall, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.“) Let‘s double check the start of the case on 919. Previous case ends with “Chambers, J.P., Dickerson, Miller and Connolly, JJ., concur.” Then the Morrow case header. Wait, let‘s look at page 919 again. “The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Neb Morrow, Appellant. [39 NYS3d 232]—” The line below it is blacked out (likely the docket number and date). Then “Appeal by the defendant...“. Then “Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.” The opinion continues onto page 920. At the end of page 921: “Chambers, J.P., Hall, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.” **Law Citations:** - `Judiciary Law § 517 (c)` -> `Judiciary Law § 517 (c)` - `CPL 190.50` -> `CPL 190.50` **Page Numbers:** - 919, 920, 921. Let‘s start the HTML. One detail: “People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 [1961]” -> New York Court of Appeals. “People v King, 27 NY3d 147, 156 [2016]” -> New York Court of Appeals. Note on hyphenated line breaks: “self-representation” on 919 (p. 2 of OCR) “self representation” in text. In original image it is “self-\nrepresentation“. Correct: “self-representation“. “firmness” on 919 (p. 2) “firm-\nness“. Correct: “firmness“. “commencement” on 919/920 transition: “com-\nmencement“. Correct: “commencement“. “pursuant” on 920: “pursu-\nant“. Correct: “pursuant“. “unpreserved” on 920/921: “unpreserved“. “prosecutor‘s” on 921: “prosecu-\ntor‘s“. Correct: “prosecutor‘s“. “attacked” on 921: “at-\ntacked“. Correct: “attacked“. “arguments” on 921: “argu-\nments“. Correct: “arguments“. “motives” on 921: “mo-\ntives“. Correct: “motives“. “defendant‘s” on 921: “defend-\nant‘s“. Correct: “defendant‘s“. “supplemental” on 921: “supple-\nmental“. Correct: “supplemental“. Citations: - People v Crampe, 17 NY3d 469, 481 [2011] -> `cite=“17 N.Y.3d 469“`, `pinpoint=“481“`, `court=“N.Y.“`, `date=“2011“`. Note: NY3d is New York Court of Appeals (N.Y.). AD3d is Appellate Division (N.Y. App. Div.). NY2d/NY is Court of Appeals. - People v Arroyo, 98 NY2d 101, 103 [2002] -> `cite=“98 N.Y.2d 101“`, `pinpoint=“103“`, `court=“N.Y.“`, `date=“2002“`. - People v Providence, 2 NY3d 579, 583 [2004] -> `cite=“2 N.Y.3d 579“`, `pinpoint=“583“`, `court=“N.Y.“`, `date=“2004“`. - People v Lindsey, 121 AD3d 715, 715 [2014] -> `cite=“121 A.D.3d 715“`, `pinpoint=“715“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2014“`. - People v Vivenzio, 62 NY2d 775, 776 [1984] -> `cite=“62 N.Y.2d 775“`, `pinpoint=“776“`, `court=“N.Y.“`, `date=“1984“`. - People v Guzman, 116 AD3d 790, 791 [2014] -> `cite=“116 A.D.3d 790“`, `pinpoint=“791“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2014“`. - People v Allison, 69 AD3d 740, 741 [2010] -> `cite=“69 A.D.3d 740“`, `pinpoint=“741“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2010“`. - People v Crampe, 17 NY3d at 482 -> `type=“short“`. - People v Providence, 2 NY3d at 583-584 -> `type=“short“`. - People v Harris, 292 AD2d 633, 634 [2002] -> `cite=“292 A.D.2d 633“`, `pinpoint=“634“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2002“`. - People v Miley, 154 AD2d 559, 559 [1989] -> `cite=“154 A.D.2d 559“`, `pinpoint=“559“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“1989“`. - People v Cusamano, 22 AD3d 427, 428 [2005] -> `cite=“22 A.D.3d 427“`, `pinpoint=“428“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2005“`. - People v Delaron, 184 AD2d 653, 654 [1992] -> `cite=“184 A.D.2d 653“`, `pinpoint=“654“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“1992“`. - People v King, 27 NY3d 147, 156 [2016] -> `cite=“27 N.Y.3d 147“`, `pinpoint=“156“`, `court=“N.Y.“`, `date=“2016“`. - People v Toussaint, 40 AD3d 1017, 1017-1018 [2007] -> `cite=“40 A.D.3d 1017“`, `pinpoint=“1017-1018“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2007“`. - People v Toussaint, 40 AD3d at 1018 -> `type=“short“`. - People v Bruno, 127 AD3d 986, 987 [2015] -> `cite=“127 A.D.3d 986“`, `pinpoint=“987“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2015“`. - People v Walters, 120 AD3d 1272, 1273 [2014] -> `cite=“120 A.D.3d 1272“`, `pinpoint=“1273“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2014“`. - People v Howell, 207 AD2d 412, 413 [1994] -> `cite=“207 A.D.2d 412“`, `pinpoint=“413“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“1994“`. - People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 [1961] -> `cite=“9 N.Y.2d 286“`, `court=“N.Y.“`, `date=“1961“`. - People v Franklin, 77 AD3d 676, 676 [2010] -> `cite=“77 A.D.3d 676“`, `pinpoint=“676“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2010“`. - People v Helenese, 75 AD3d 653, 655 [2010] -> `cite=“75 A.D.3d 653“`, `pinpoint=“655“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2010“`. - People v Jacobs, 71 AD3d 693, 693 [2010] -> `cite=“71 A.D.3d 693“`, `pinpoint=“693“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2010“`. - People v Swinson, 227 AD2d 508 [1996] -> `cite=“227 A.D.2d 508“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“1996“`. - People v Guzman, 138 AD3d 1140, 1140 [2016] -> `cite=“138 A.D.3d 1140“`, `pinpoint=“1140“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2016“`. - People v Blue, 136 AD3d 840 [2016] -> `cite=“136 A.D.3d 840“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2016“`. - People v Barber, 133 AD3d 868, 871 [2015] -> `cite=“133 A.D.3d 868“`, `pinpoint=“871“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2015“`. - People v Ferraro, 49 AD3d 550, 551 [2008] -> `cite=“49 A.D.3d 550“`, `pinpoint=“551“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2008“`. - People v Phillips, 285 AD2d 477, 478 [2001] -> `cite=“285 A.D.2d 477“`, `pinpoint=“478“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2001“`. - People v Thomas, 186 AD2d 602 [1992] -> `cite=“186 A.D.2d 602“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“1992“`. - People v Williams, 1 AD3d 284, 285 [2003] -> `cite=“1 A.D.3d 284“`, `pinpoint=“285“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2003“`. - People v Gonzalez, 298 AD2d 133, 133-134 [2002] -> `cite=“298 A.D.2d 133“`, `pinpoint=“133-134“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2002“`. - People v Bryant, 294 AD2d 221 [2002] -> `cite=“294 A.D.2d 221“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2002“`. - People v Banks, 258 AD2d 525, 526 [1999] -> `cite=“258 A.D.2d 525“`, `pinpoint=“526“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“1999“`. - People v Brown, 139 AD3d 964, 966 [2016] -> `cite=“139 A.D.3d 964“`, `pinpoint=“966“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2016“`. - People v Sylvain, 33 AD3d 330, 331-332 [2006] -> `cite=“33 A.D.3d 330“`, `pinpoint=“331-332“`, `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`, `date=“2006“`. - People v Brown, 139 AD3d at 966 -> `type=“short“`. - People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242 [1975] -> `cite=“36 N.Y.2d 230“`, `pinpoint=“242“`, `court=“N.Y.“`, `date=“1975“`. Final check: The judges listed at the end are: Chambers, J.P., Hall, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur. Case start: “The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Neb Morrow, Appellant. [39 NYS3d 232]—” The page numbers are 919, 920, 921. Wait, I should check the date on 919. It says “rendered December 13, 2010” but that is the judgment being appealed. The Appellate Division decision date is June 1, 2016. I will use the date from the reporter volume year if possible, or just the judgment date as found in text if the specific decision date isn‘t visible. Looking at the screenshot, the decision date is redacted. 39 NYS3d is 2016. 140 AD3d is 2016. I‘ll put 2016-06-01 as the date if I can verify it, otherwise 2016. Searching `39 NYS3d 232`: June 1, 2016. One more law cite check: `Judiciary Law § 517 (c)` -> `Judiciary Law § 517 (c)` The prompt says use two letter state abbreviation: NY. Double check: “Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.” - this is part of the pre-opinion content or start of opinion? Usually AD decisions have these short paragraphs before the main discussion. I will treat everything after Case Information as body content. Transcription note: Page 919: “firmness” is split. Page 920: “commencement” is split. Page 920: “pursuant” is split. Page 921: “prosecutor‘s” is split. Page 921: “attacked” is split. Page 921: “arguments” is split. Page 921: “motives” is split. Page 921: “defendant‘s” is split. Page 921: “supplemental” is split. Wait, looking at the image: Page 920: “(seePeople v Toussaint...” - OCR missed a space. “Judiciary Law § 517 (c)in exercising...” - OCR missed a space. “pursu ant” - OCR added a space. “unpreseryed” - OCR typo for “unpreserved“. “People vRosario” - OCR missed a space. “seePeople v Franklin” - OCR missed a space. I must fix these OCR errors to match the image precisely (which has the spaces/correct spelling). Let‘s begin.