innеr_thought Expert legal document formatter. Clean, semantic HTML. * Clean, semantic HTML. * Preserve content exactly. * Structure: Case Information (details/summary), Pre-Opinion content, Opinion Body, Signature Block. * Pagination: `` at page starts/boundaries. * Footnotes: `` and ``. * Citations: `` and `` with specific attributes. * Reflow text: No PDF line breaks, no `
`, rejoin hyphenated line breaks. * Remove: Headers/footers, line numbers, caption separators, styling, etc. * Multi-opinion: Convert only the main/complete opinion. * Output: Raw HTML, no code fences. * *Document Analysis:* * Page 1449: Ends a case (People v. Boone, etc.). Starts a new case: "The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William J. Miner, Appellant." [991 NYS2d 679]. * Page 1450: Continues and ends the Miner case. Starts another case (Matter of Amara B. Schwartz). * *Main Case to Extract:* People v. William J. Miner. * Case Name: The People of the State of New York v. William J. Miner. * Short Name: People v. Miner. * Docket/Citation: [991 NYS2d 679]. (Wait, 991 NYS2d 679 is the reporter citation). * Court: County Court of Saratoga County (mentioned in text), but this is an appellate decision (looks like Appellate Division, Third Department, given the judges McCarthy, Garry, Egan Jr., Clark). * Date: April 2, 2013 (judgment date). The appellate decision date isn't explicitly at the top, but the reporter citation is 991 NYS2d 679. Actually, looking at the layout, this is likely from the Appellate Division reports (AD3d). * Judges: Clark, J. (writing), McCarthy, J.P, Garry, Egan Jr., Lynch, JJ (concurring). * `midpagе-case-name`: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v WILLIAM J. MINER, Appellant. * `shortName`: People v. Miner. * `midpage-citation`: 991 NYS2d 679 * Note: The docket isn't explicitly listed in the caption provided, but usually there's one. I will use the citation provided. * *Start of Page 1449:* Skip the fragment of the previous case. * *New Case:* The People of the State of New York v. William J. Miner. * *Caption Content:* "The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William J. Miner, Appellant. [991 NYS2d 679]—" * *Body starts:* "Clark, J. Appeal from a judgment..." * Page 1449: starts mid-page. * Page 1450: starts after "... lv". * `CPL 470.05 [2]` -> `CPL 470.05 [2]` * `People v Boone, 101 AD3d 1358, 1359 [2012]` -> `People v Boone, 101 AD3d 1358, 1359 [2012]` * `lv denied 20 NY3d 1096 [2013]` -> `lv denied 20 NY3d 1096 [2013]` * `People v Foote, 102 AD3d 1056, 1057 [2013]` -> `People v Foote, 102 AD3d 1056, 1057 [2013]` * `lv denied 20 NY3d 1098 [2013]` -> `lv denied 20 NY3d 1098 [2013]` * `Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA)` -> (Not a cite) * `Correction Law §§ 168-f [4]; 168-t` -> `Correction Law §§ 168-f [4]; 168-t` * `People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]` -> `People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]` * `People v Swindell, ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍72 AD3d 1340, 1341 [2010]` -> `People v Swindell, 72 AD3d 1340, 1341 [2010]` * `lv denied 15 NY3d 778 [2010]` -> `lv denied 15 NY3d 778 [2010]` * `People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]` -> `People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]` * `People v Morey, 110 AD3d 1378, 1379 [2013]` -> `People v Morey, 110 AD3d 1378, 1379 [2013]` * `lv denied 23 NY3d 965 [2014]` -> `lv denied 23 NY3d 965 [2014]` * `People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 361, 365-366 [2013]` -> `People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 361, 365-366 [2013]` * `People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]` -> `People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]` * `People v Shovah, 67 AD3d 1257, 1258 [2009]` -> `People v Shovah, 67 AD3d 1257, 1258 [2009]` * `lv denied 14 NY3d 773 [2010]` -> `lv denied 14 NY3d 773 [2010]` * `People v Kennedy, 46 AD3d 1099, 1100 [2007]` -> `People v Kennedy, 46 AD3d 1099, 1100 [2007]` * `lv denied 10 NY3d 841 [2008]` -> `lv denied 10 NY3d 841 [2008]` * `CPL article 440` -> `CPL article 440` * `People v Haffiz, ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍19 NY3d 883, 885 [2012]` -> `People v Haffiz, 19 NY3d 883, 885 [2012]` * `People v Moyer, 75 AD3d 1004, 1006-1007 [2010]` -> `People v Moyer, 75 AD3d 1004, 1006-1007 [2010]` * `People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]` -> `People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]` * `People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]` -> `People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]` * `People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280 [1992]` -> `People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280 [1992]` * `People v Wolz, 112 AD3d 1150, 1151-1152 [2013]` -> `People v Wolz, 112 AD3d 1150, 1151-1152 [2013]` * `People v Elmer, 19 NY3d 501, 510 [2012]` -> `People v Elmer, 19 NY3d 501, 510 [2012]` * *Correction regarding `lv denied`:* Usually, in New York citations, "lv denied" is a subsequent history. I should treat it as such where appropriate. For example: `People v Boone, 101 AD3d 1358, 1359 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1096 [2013]` should be two separate midpage-case tags if they refer to different decisions, or linked if history. Instructions say: "Each citation in its own tag... Subsequent History: Each citation in its own tag". * *Correction regarding reporter abbreviations:* `AD3d` -> `A.D.3d` `NY3d` -> `N.Y.3d` `NY2d` -> `N.Y.2d` * *Short form/Id check:* `People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d at 8` -> `People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d at 8` `People v Morey, 110 AD3d at 1379` -> `People v Morey, 110 AD3d at 1379` `People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256` -> `People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256` * *Pagination placement:* Page 1449 ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍starts inside the PDF. I should start with ``. The break between 1449 and 1450 happens mid-sentence: "... lv denied 14 NY3d 773 [2010]". * *Details block:* * `shortName="People v. Miner"` * `court="N.Y. App. Div."` (Inferring from the names and format of the reporter page) * `date="2014"`? The citation is `991 NYS2d 679`. Looking up this citation revеals the case was decided June 26, 2014. However, I should stick to info in the text if possible. The text says "rendered April 2, 2013" for the lower court judgment. Usually, the year in brackets in citations like `[2014]` indicates the appellate year. I will use 2014 based on context and standard citations. * *Rejoining words:* "convic-\ntion" -> "conviction" "in-\nformation" -> "information" "vеrifica-\ntion" -> "verification" "al-\nlocution" -> "allocution" "situ-\national" -> "situational" "automati-\ncally" -> "automatically" * *Multi-case rule:* The document shows the end of one case, a full case, and the start of another. I will extract only "People v. William J. Miner". * *Formatting caption:* The caption text is "The People of the Statе of New York, Respondent, v William J. Miner, Appellant. [991 NYS2d 679]—" I'll put this in the `details` block. * *Wait, the instructions say "Extract metadata here, don't repeat in body".* So I'll put the caption content in the metadata. * *Judges:* Clark, J. (writing), McCarthy, J.P, Garry, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur. (Note Clark is writing the opinion). * *Final check on pagination:* First page of document provided is 1449. Page 1449 text starts after the horizontal line. Page 1450 text starts after the `lv`. * *Case Citations Review:* - `People v Boone, 101 AD3d 1358, 1359 [2012]` -> `cite="101 A.D.3d 1358" pinpoint="1359" court="N.Y. App. Div." date="2012"` - `lv denied 20 NY3d 1096 [2013]` -> `case="People v. Boone" cite="20 N.Y.3d 1096" court="N.Y." date="2013"` - `People v Foote, 102 AD3d 1056, 1057 [2013]` -> `cite="102 A.D.3d 1056" pinpoint="1057" court="N.Y. App. Div." date="2013"` - `lv denied 20 NY3d 1098 [2013]` -> `case="People v. Foote" cite="20 N.Y.3d 1098" court="N.Y." date="2013"` - `People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]` -> `cite="74 N.Y.2d 1" pinpoint="10" court="N.Y." date="1989"` - `People v Swindell, 72 AD3d 1340, 1341 [2010]` -> `cite="72 A.D.3d 1340" pinpoint="1341" court="N.Y. App. Div." date="2010"` - `lv denied 15 NY3d 778 [2010]` -> `case="People v. Swindell" cite="15 N.Y.3d 778" court="N.Y." date="2010"` - `People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]` -> `cite="71 N.Y.2d 662" pinpoint="665" court="N.Y." date="1988"` - `People v Morey, 110 AD3d 1378, 1379 [2013]` -> `cite="110 A.D.3d 1378" pinpoint="1379" court="N.Y. App. Div." date="2013"` - `lv denied 23 NY3d 965 [2014]` -> `case="People v. Morey" cite="23 N.Y.3d 965" court="N.Y." date="2014"` - `People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 361, 365-366 [2013]` -> `cite="22 N.Y.3d 359" pinpoint="361, 365-366" court="N.Y." date="2013"` - `People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]` -> `cite="82 N.Y.2d 536" pinpoint="543" court="N.Y." date="1993"` - `People v Shovah, 67 AD3d 1257, 1258 [2009]` -> `cite="67 A.D.3d 1257" pinpoint="1258" court="N.Y. App. Div." date="2009"` - `lv denied 14 NY3d 773 [2010]` -> `case="People v. Shovah" cite="14 N.Y.3d 773" court="N.Y." date="2010"` - `People v Kennedy, 46 AD3d 1099, 1100 [2007]` -> `cite="46 A.D.3d 1099" pinpoint="1100" сourt="N.Y. App. Div." date="2007"` - `lv denied 10 NY3d 841 [2008]` -> `case="People v. Kennedy" cite="10 N.Y.3d 841" court="N.Y." date="2008"` - `People v Haffiz, 19 NY3d 883, 885 [2012]` -> `cite="19 N.Y.3d 883" pinpoint="885" court="N.Y." date="2012"` - `People v Moyer, 75 AD3d 1004, 1006-1007 [2010]` -> `cite="75 A.D.3d 1004" pinpoint="1006-1007" court="N.Y. App. Div." date="2010"` - `People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]` -> `cite="6 N.Y.3d 248" pinpoint="256" court="N.Y." date="2006"` - `People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]` -> `cite="18 N.Y.3d 257" pinpoint="264" court="N.Y." date="2011"` - `People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280 [1992]` -> `cite="80 N.Y.2d 273" pinpoint="280" court="N.Y." date="1992"` - `People v Wolz, 112 AD3d 1150, 1151-1152 [2013]` -> `cite="112 A.D.3d 1150" pinpoint="1151-1152" court="N.Y. App. Div." date="2013"` - `People v Elmer, 19 NY3d 501, 510 [2012]` -> `cite="19 N.Y.3d 501" pinpoint="510" court="N.Y." date="2012"` * *Law Citations Review:* - `CPL 470.05 [2]` -> `jurisdiction="NY" cite="N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 470.05(2)"` - `Correction Law §§ 168-f [4]` -> `jurisdiction="NY" cite="N.Y. Correct. Law § 168-f(4)"` - `Correction Law 168-t` -> `jurisdiction="NY" cite="N.Y. Correct. Law § 168-t"` - `CPL article 440` -> `jurisdiction="NY" cite="N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law art. 440"` * *Short Law Cites:* None obvious. * *Caption Metadata Check:* Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William J. Miner, Appellant. Citation: 991 NYS2d 679 (which is 991 N.Y.S.2d 679) ShortName: People v. Miner Court: N.Y. App. Div. (Appellate Division, Third Department) Date: (No clear date in text except judgment date. I'll omit the date attribute from midpаge-date if I can't find the exact opinion date, or use the citation year 2014 as the best guess). The judgments listed are from 2013, the citation year is 2014. * *Judge writing the opinion:* Clark, J. * *Page number priority:* Reporter page numbers are present (1449, 1450). * *Rejoining hyphenated words:* "convic-\ntion" -> "conviction" "in-\nformation" -> "information" "cor-\nrection" -> "Corrеction" (Wait, "Cor-\nrection Law" -> "Correction Law") "verifica-\ntion" -> "verification" "al-\nlocution" -> "allocution" "situ-\national" -> "situational" "automati-\ncally" -> "automatically" * *Wait:* `11/3 to 4 years` -> This is `1 1/3 to 4 years`. The OCR says `V-h to 4`. Looking at the image, it is `1 1/3 to 4`. I will use the image text: `1 1/3 to 4`. * *Final Structure:* `

` `` `

Clark, J. ...

` `

In January 2013 ...

` `

Defendant's challenge ... ...

` `

Likewise, defendant ...

` `

...

` * *Citation `lv denied`:* I'll wrap them like: `lv denied 20 NY3d 1096 [2013]` * *Judges list at the end:* McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., сoncur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. (This is the conclusion of the case). * *Pre-Opinion Content:* The syllabus/headnotes block `[991 NYS2d 679]` is part of the case caption info. I'll include it in metadata. * *Starting the document:* The document provided starts with a fragment of `People v Boone`. I must skip this as per "Multi-Opinion Documents" rule ("convert only the MAIN opinion... Skip partial content from a previous case"). * *The Main Case:* The main case is People v. William J. Miner. * *HTML generation begins:* * *Citation detail check:* `People v Morey, 110 AD3d at 1379` Earlier it was `110 AD3d 1378`. Full Cite: `People v Morey, 110 AD3d 1378, 1379 [2013]` Short Cite: `People v Morey, 110 AD3d at 1379` * *Wait, the first page starts mid-Boone.* I skip to "The People of the Statе of New York...". * *Details:* ```html

Case Information

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v WILLIAM J. MINER, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

991 N.Y.S.2d 679 | 118 A.D.3d 1149

Clark, J.

[991 NYS2d 679]

``` Actually, looking at the top right of the first screenshot, the page number is `1449`. The citation is usually `[Volume] AD3d [Page]`. If this is page 1449, the official cite is `118 AD3d 1149`. The text mentions `[991 NYS2d 679]`. I'll use what's visible. * *Wait, there's another case at the end of рage 1450.* "In the Matter of the Claim of AMARA B. SCHWARTZ...". I stop after the affirmation of the Miner judgment. * *Caption Text:* "The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William J. Miner, Appellant." * *Starting Paragraph:* "Clark, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, J.), rendered April 2, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea оf guilty of the crime of failing to register under the Sex Offender Registration Act." * ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍ *Re-verifying `lv denied` in string cites:* `... lv denied 15 NY3d 778 [2010]) and was preserved ...` This `lv denied` is part of the Swindell citation string. `People v Swindell, 72 AD3d 1340, 1341 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 778 [2010]` Instructions: "Each citation in its own tag". * *Reviewing OCR errors in input:* `V-h to 4` -> `1 1/3 to 4` `1449` -> `1149`? No, the image says `1449`. The official cite for this case is 118 AD3d 1149, but the book page is 1449. I'll use `n="1449"`. `V-h` is cleаrly `1 1/3` in the screenshot. * *One more thing:* "McCarthy, J.P" vs "McCarthy, J.P.". Screenshot has a period after J.P. "McCarthy, J.P., Garry...". I will follow the image. * *Normalization of Law:* `Correction Law §§ 168-f [4]; 168-t` -> `Correction Law §§ 168-f [4]; 168-t` * *Normalization of AD3d:* I'll use `A.D.3d` in the `cite` attribute and `AD3d` in the text as written. * *Correction on short forms:* `People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d at 8` `case="People v. Seaberg" cite="74 N.Y.2d 1" pinpoint="8" court="N.Y." type="short"` * *Pagination for Miner Case:* Starts on 1449. Transitions to 1450 mid-sentence. Miner Case ends on 1450. * *Reflowing logic:* "convic-\ntion" -> "conviction" "in-\nformation" -> "information" "Cor-\nrection" -> "Correction" "verifica-\ntion" -> "verification" "al-\nlocution" -> "allocution" "situ-\national" -> "situational" "automati-\ncally" -> "automatically" * *One detail:* "V-h to 4" in OCR is `1 1/3 to 4` in the image. I will use the image text. * *Citation pinpointing:* `22 NY3d 359, 361, 365-366 [2013]` `cite="22 N.Y.3d 359" pinpoint="361, 365-366"` * *Signature Block:* ```html

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

``` Actually, the signature is the list of judges and the order. * *Wait:* Clark, J. is the author, so I'll include her in Case Info or as a lead-in. The `details` block gets metadata. * *Citing the court:* `County Court of Saratoga County` is mentioned in the text. The appellate court is the `Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department`. * *Citation Volume/Reporter for AD3d:* Text: `AD3d` Normalization: `A.D.3d` * *Check `lv denied`:* `lv denied 20 NY3d 1096 [2013]` `case="People v. Boone" cite="20 N.Y.3d 1096" court="N.Y." date="2013"` * *One last look at the image:* "V-h to 4" (OCR) is definitely "1 1/3 to 4". "McCarthy, J.P, Garry" (OCR) -> Image has `J.P.,`. "Ordered that the judgment is affirmed." is the conclusion. * *Page 1450 mid-paragraph:* "... lv denied 14 NY3d 773 [2010]" Wait, in the text: `People v Shovah, 67 AD3d 1257, 1258 [2009], lv` (end of 1449) `denied 14 NY3d 773 [2010]` (start of 1450). Correct. * *Self-Correction on `shortName`:* "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK" -> "People" "WILLIAM J. MINER" -> "Miner" Result: `People v. Miner` * *Double check on CPL citations:* `CPL 470.05 [2]` -> `cite="N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 470.05(2)"` `CPL article 440` -> `cite="N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law art. 440"` * *Final check on date:* The opinion mentions 2013 and 2014 in citations. The deсision itself is likely 2014. I'll omit the `date` in Case Information to avoid hallucinating, or if required, I'll use the year from the cite `[2014]`. Actually, looking at the layout, the brackets usually mean opinion year. I'll just leave `YYYY` if I can't find the exact month/day. I'll omit for now as it's not explicitly in the caption. * *Wait, the instruction says:* `date` Yes** ... Year (YYYY) or full date (YYYY-MM-DD) if known. I will use 2014. * *Normalization of `Correction Law §§ 168-f [4]`* Jurisdiction: NY. Cite: `N.Y. Correct. Law § 168-f(4)` * *String Citation Handling:* `see People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 361, 365-366 [2013]; People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Shovah, 67 AD3d 1257, 1258 [2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 773 [2010]` Each needs a tag. * *Boone cite on the fragment at the top:* Skip everything before "The People of the State of New York...". * *Miner citation detail:* `Miner, Appellant. [991 NYS2d 679]—` This dash belongs to the caption. * *Judge writing the opinion:* Clark, J. (at the start of the body). * *Wait, the OCR for Clark, J. paragraph has:* `convict- ing` -> `convicting` `in- formation` -> `information` `Cor- rection` -> `Correction` `verifica- tion` -> `verification` `al- locution` -> `allocution` `situ- ational` -> `situational` `automati- cally` -> `automatically` * *Correction on SORA reference:* `Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) (see Correction Law §§ 168-f [4]; 168-t)` The cite is for the statute sections. * *Citation Pinpoints:* `People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d at 8` `People v Morey, 110 AD3d at 1379` `People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256` * *Wait, in the Miner text:* `People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]` (Full) `People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256` (Short) Wait, no, let me check the text... "County Court made сlear that the appeal waiver was 'separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty' (People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011])." And later: "... (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256)." And another earlier: "People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]" Note: There are two different Lopez сases (71 NY2d 662 and 6 NY3d 248). Need to distinguish. * *Final check on signatures:* McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. (Clark, J. wrote the opinion). * *HTML Structure:* `

` `` `

Clark, J. ...

` `

In January 2013 ...

` `

Defendant's challenge ... ...

` `

Likewise, defendant ...

` `

...

` * *One nuance:* The citation `[991 NYS2d 679]` is in the caption. I'll include it in Case Information. * *One nuance:* "V-h to 4" (OCR) -> `1 1/3 to 4`. Looking at the image, it is exactly `1 1/3 to 4`. * *One nuance:* "lv denied 15 NY3d 778 [2010]" `case="People v. Swindell" cite="15 N.Y.3d 778" court="N.Y." date="2010"` (Since it follows `People v Swindell`). * *Check on `lv denied` without immediate parent case:* `lv denied 23 NY3d 965 [2014]` (follows Morey) `lv denied 14 NY3d 773 [2010]` (follows Shovah) `lv denied 10 NY3d 841 [2008]` (follows Kennedy) * *Short form for `People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d at 8`:* `case="People v. Seaberg" cite="74 N.Y.2d 1" pinpoint="8" court="N.Y." type="short"` I need to ensure `cite` for short forms is the starting рage. `74 NY2d 1`. * *Short form for `People v Morey, 110 AD3d at 1379`:* `case="People v. Morey" cite="110 A.D.3d 1378" pinpoint="1379" court="N.Y. App. Div." type="short"` * *Short form for `People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256`:* `case="People v. Lopez" cite="6 N.Y.3d 248" pinpoint="256" court="N.Y." type="short"` (This refers to the 2006 case). * *One more check:* "McCarthy, J.P, Garry" (OCR) -> "McCarthy, J.P., Garry" (Image). "J.P, Garry" (Page 1) vs "J.P., Garry" (Page 2). Page 1 OCR says `McCarthy, J.P, Garry...`. Screenshot shows `McCarthy, J.P., Garry...`. Page 2 OCR says `McCarthy, J.P., Garry...`. Screenshot shows `McCarthy, J.P., Garry...`. I will use `J.P.,` as per the images. * *The citation string:* `(see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]; People v Swindell, 72 AD3d 1340, 1341 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 778 [2010])` Each is tagged. * *The judgment citation:* `(Scarano, J.), rendered April 2, 2013` Not a legal citation to wrap. * *Final Paragraph on page 1450:* "Defendant's remaining claims, to the extent not expressly discussed, have been reviewed and determined to be without merit." Then the concurrence and order. * *Done.* Proceeding to generate HTML. * *Wait, the first paragraph of the opinion text:* "Clark, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, J.), rendered April 2, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of failing to register under the Sex Offender Registration Act." (Rejoining "convict-ing"). * *Second paragraph:* "In January 2013, defendant, a registered sex offender, waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging him with the reduced crime of failing to report an address change within 10 days as a first offense, under the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) (see Correction Law §§ 168-f [4]; 168-t). Pursuant to the plea agreement, which included an appeal waiver, defendant pleaded guilty as charged and, after his pro se oral motion to withdraw his guilty plea was dеnied, he was sentenced, as agreed, to 1 1/3 to 4 years in prison, to be served concurrently to another sentence he was then serving for failing to comply with SORA verification requirements. Defendant now appeals, contending that his plea and appeal waiver were invalid and that the sentence is harsh and excessive." * *Third paragraph:* "Defendant's challenge to his guilty plea as involuntary survives an appeal waiver (see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]; People v Swindell, 72 AD3d 1340, 1341 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 778 [2010]) and was preserved by his motion to withdraw his plea (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; People v Morey, 110 AD3d 1378, 1379 [2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 965 [2014]). However, the record reflects that his guilty plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent (see People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 361, 365-366 [2013]; People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Shovah, 67 AD3d 1257, 1258 [2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 773 [2010]; People v Kennedy, 46 AD3d 1099, 1100 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 841 [2008])." * *Check on `lv denied` history tagging:* `... lv denied 15 NY3d 778 [2010])` Instruction: "Subsequent history: Each citation in its own tag". Correct. * *Pagination logic check:* The case starts on 1449. `lv denied 14 NY3d 773 [2010]` (Based on OCR `lv` at end of 1449 and `denied` at start of 1450). * *Final detail:* "Ordered that the judgment is affirmed." is part of the order. I'll put it in the signature/conclusion block. * *Rejoining line breaks:* "convic- tion" -> "conviction" "in- formation" -> "information" "Cor- rection" -> "Correction" "verifica- tion" -> "verification" "al- locution" -> "allocution" "situ- ational" -> "situational" "automati- cally" -> "automatically" (Wait, `convic- tion` is at the end of the first paragraph of body). * *One nuance:* In the Case Info `midpage-citation`: "991 N.Y.S.2d 679" is the specific cite given in brackets. The page number 1449 implies it's from 118 AD3d 1149. I will use both if reasonable, ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍or just the one provided. Caption: `[991 NYS2d 679]`. I'll use `991 N.Y.S.2d 679`. * *The judges' titles:* `J.P.`, `J.`, `JJ.` - these should be preserved. * *Quotes check:* Ensure straight quotes. * *Reflowed text for "1 1/3 to 4 years":* OCR had `V-h to 4`. Image has `1 1/3 to 4`. I'll use the fraction `1 1/3`. * *Wait, the court in Miner case is definitely the Appellate Division.* Judges McCarthy, Garry, Egan Jr., Clark are Appellate Division, Third Department judges. * *Final paragraph check:* "Defendant's remaining claims, to the extent not expressly discussed, have been reviewed and determined to be without merit." "McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed." * *Done.* Ready to output raw HTML.