midpage

People v. MillsPeople v. Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 27, 2011
Versions:90 A.D.3d 1076
934 N.Y.2d 862

Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentences of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required periods of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Algarin, 89 AD3d 859 [2011]).

The defendant‘s remaining contention is without merit.

Skelos, J.P., Angiolillo, Belen, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Mills
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 27, 2011
Citations: 90 A.D.3d 1076; 934 N.Y.2d 862
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In