People v. KhanPeople v. Khan
Defendant‘s sole contention is that the sentence is harsh and excessive. Based upon our review of the record, we disagree. Defendant has an extensive criminal record and has been arrested a number of times while on parole. During his commission of the crime in question, defendant exhibited violent tendencies by physically overpowering the victim and causing him injuries. In view of this, we find no extraordinary circumstances nor any abuse of discretion warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Gorrell, 63 AD3d 1381, 1381-1382 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 744 [2009]; People v Stover, 54 AD3d 1068, 1069 [2008]).
Mercure, J.P., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.