People v. StoverPeople v. Stover
- Reporters:
- ,
Defendant‘s sole contention is that his sentence is harsh and excessive. We disagree. Defendant has a lengthy criminal record and engaged in violent conduct during the course of committing the bank robbery in question. In view of this and inasmuch as the sentence was within the agreed-upon range, we find no extraordinary circumstances nor any abuse of discretion that would warrant modifying the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Salmans, 49 AD3d 961, 961 [2008]; People v McCarthy, 23 AD3d 919, 919-920 [2005]).
Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.