People v. HallPeople v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New YorkJul 2, 2015Check Treatment (8)Versions:130 A.D.3d 149511 N.Y.S.3d 498 It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We previously held this case, reserved decision, and remitted the matter to County Court to make and state for the record its determination whether defendant is a youthful offender (People v Hall, 119 AD3d 1349, 1350 [2014]). Upon remittal the court, after considering the appropriate factors (see People v Cruickshank, 105 AD2d 325, 334 [1985], affd sub nom. People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625 [1986]), refused to grant defendant youthful offender status. We conclude that the court did not thereby abuse its discretion (see People v Johnson, 109 AD3d 1191, 1191-1192 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 997 [2013]), and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender (see generally People v Shrubsall, 167 AD2d 929, 930-931 [1990]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Sconiers and DeJoseph, JJ.