People v. Floyd

Dec 26, 2013
Versions:112 A.D.3d 963
976 N.Y.S.2d 894

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendаnt‘s purрorted waiver of ‍‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‍the right to apрeаl was invаlid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257 [2006]; People v Jones, 106 AD3d 1106 [2013]; People v Sommerville, 104 AD3d 880 [2013]; People v McHugh, 101 AD3d 754 [2012]; People v Badru, 98 AD3d 1132 [2012]; cf. People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359 [2013]) and, thus, does not precludе review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary ‍‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‍to the defendant‘s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Angiolillo, Balkin and Hall, JJ., concur.