midpage

People v. JonesPeople v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 29, 2013
Versions:106 A.D.3d 1106
965 N.Y.S.2d 730

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant‘s purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; People v Sommerville, 104 AD3d 880 [2013]; People v McHugh, 101 AD3d 754 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1101 [2013]; People v Badru, 98 AD3d 1132 [2012]), and thus does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Jones
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 29, 2013
Citations: 106 A.D.3d 1106; 965 N.Y.S.2d 730
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In