People v. BarnhillPeople v. Barnhill
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
“The defendant‘s challenge to the validity of his waiver of indictment is not forfeited by his plea of guilty and would not be precluded by any valid waiver of the right to appeal” (People v Yunga, 122 AD3d 951, 951 [2014]; see People v Boston, 75 NY2d 585, 589 n [1990]; People v Sze, 113 AD3d 795 [2014]; People v Libby, 246 AD2d 669, 670-671 [1998]). Nor does that claim require preservation (see People v Boston, 75 NY2d at 589 n; People v Yunga, 122 AD3d at 951). Nevertheless, contrary to the defendant‘s contention, his waiver of indictment was valid (see