People v. SzePeople v. Sze
” ‘A criminal defendant‘s right to a speedy trial is guaranteed both by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution (
The defendant‘s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, except to the extent that the alleged ineffective assistance affected the voluntariness of his plea (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257 [2006]; People v Dunne, 106 AD3d 928, 928-929 [2013]; People v Smith, 102 AD3d 896, 897 [2013]). Insofar as the defendant contends that his counsel‘s conduct affected the voluntariness of his plea, contrary to the defendant‘s contention, his attorney provided him with meaningful representation (see People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).
The defendant‘s remaining contentions are without merit.
Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.