People ex rel. Simpson v. GreenePeople ex rel. Simpson v. Greene
Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to
In light of the information contained in the record, including documents entitled “sentence and commitment,” it is apparent that petitioner would not be entitled to immediate release even if he prevailed here and, hence, habeas corpus is not available to him (see People ex rel. Pilgrim v Greene, 16 AD3d 787, 788 [2005]). Accordingly, petitioner‘s application was properly dismissed without a hearing.
Carpinello, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.