People ex rel. Pilgrim v. GreenePeople ex rel. Pilgrim v. Greene
Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to
In light of the information found in the record, including a document entitled “sentence and order of commitment,” it is apparent that “petitioner would not be entitled to immediate release even if successful in his argument” and, thus, habeas corpus is not available to him (Matter of Frazier v Greene, 10 AD3d 743, 743 [2004]; see People ex rel. Burr v Smith, 6 AD3d 841 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 605 [2004]).
Mercure, J.P., Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.