Molina v. StateMolina v. State
Versions:867 So. 2d 6452004 WL 575738
We agree that the defendant was not entitled to credit for time served in an in-patient drug treatment program as required as a condition of his probation. Pennington v. State, 398 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1981); Smith v. State, 849 So.2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Toney v. State, 817 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
Affirmed.