Smith v. StateSmith v. State
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Farmer, Gunther, Polen (per curiam)
Marion Smith (“Appellant“) seeks review of an order denying his
Appellant seeks our determination that the drug farm is the functional equivalent of a jail for all intents and purposes and asks that he be awarded an additional jail credit. His claim raises questions of fact as to the coerciveness and restrictiveness of the program. Appellant‘s motion was properly denied because his claim requires an evidentiary hearing and must be raised in a
This court makes no determination as to whether a prisoner is entitled to jail time credit for time served in the drug farm. Williams v. State, 711 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Robinson v. State, 689 So.2d 1147, 1149 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
Our affirmance, however, is without prejudice for Appellant to raise this claim
FARMER, C.J., GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.