McGowan v. StateMcGowan v. State
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HAVERFIELD, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Earl McGowan, appeals his conviction and “sentence” for robbery and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense.
We find defendant‘s first contention concerning the trial court‘s failure to instruct on the element of specific intent to be without merit. See Bell v. State, 354 So.2d 1266 (Fla.3d DCA 1978).
McGowan secondly argues that the trial court erred in ordering, pursuant to
Trial courts of this state have the general authority to require incarceration as a condition of probation for felony offenses pursuant to the general condition provisions of
Nevertheless, it appears that the trial judge imposed the condition that McGowan serve three of the seven years incarceration only because of the dictates of
It is so ordered.