Knight v. StateKnight v. State
Appellant appeals his life sentence under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act (“Act“) for robbery with a firearm and also raises several constitutional challenges to the Act. We find that appellant received the correct sentence under the Act and affirm.
We previously have addressed appellant‘s constitutional challenges to the Act and decline to address them again. See Jackson v. State, 744 So.2d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. granted, 749 So.2d 503 (Fla. 1999); Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. granted, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla. 1999); see also Turner v. State, 745 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Durden v. State, 743 So.2d 77 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). This court has also found that the term “felony punishable by life” in
Accordingly, we AFFIRM appellant‘s sentence, and, as we did in Woods, we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court:
DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS
SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997) , VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
AFFIRMED.
MINER, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CERTIFICATION
PER CURIAM.
We grant Appellant‘s Motion for Rehearing and Certification of a Question of Great Public Importance only to the extent that we add the following certified question to our previously issue opinion of March 27, 2000:
DOES
SECTION 775.082 (9)(A)3A, FLORIDA STATUTES (1999) , WHICH MANDATES A LIFE SENTENCE FOR PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDERS WHO COMMIT “A FELONY PUNISHABLE BY LIFE,” APPLY BOTH TO LIFE FELONIES AND FIRST DEGREE FELONIES PUNISHABLE BY IMPRISONMENT FOR A TERM OF YEARS NOT EXCEEDING LIFE?
MINER, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.