In re Na'Sir. RR.
Respondent is the father of a child (born in 2012) who was removed from his mother‘s care immediately after his birth and temporarily placed in petitioner‘s custody. Petitioner commenced this proceeding alleging derivative neglect based upon a prior neglect finding. In February 2012, following several appearances, respondent consented to a finding of neglect, without admissions, and Family Court made a finding of neglect based upon the allegations in the petition. The court thereafter
The appeal must be dismissed, as an order entered upon consent is not appealable (see Matter of Dante W. [Justin W.], 110 AD3d 1400, 1401 [2013]; Matter of Trenton G. [Lianne H.], 100 AD3d 1124, 1125 [2012]). We note that in the course of the proceedings, respondent‘s counsel misstated the law in this respect, without correction. The record also reveals, however, that respondent was advised that Family Court would enter a finding of neglect upon his consent and would then proceed with an order of disposition, and the terms of the order of supervision were described to him (see
Lahtinen, J.P., Stein and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.