In re Trenton G.
In 2011, petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to
Respondent now appeals from that order, basing her challenge upon the claim that she was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel due to the conflict of interest presented by the CDO‘s representation of an individual on petitioner‘s list of potential witnesses. However, given that an appeal does not lie from an order entered upon the consent of the appealing party (see Matter of Violette K. [Sheila E.K.], 96 AD3d 1499 [2012]; Matter of Shaliyah P. [Eddie P.], 90 AD3d 1054 [2011]; Matter of Bianca QQ. [Kiyonna SS.], 75 AD3d 679, 681 [2010]), we must dismiss the appeal. Were we to consider the claim in any event, we would find it to be without merit.
Spain, Malone Jr., Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.