In Re Kai G. New Alternatives for Children, Inc.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
This proceeding was commenced to terminate the parental rights of the mother and the father of the subject child on the grounds of permanent neglect and mental illness as defined in
The Family Court properly found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the parents had failed to comply with certain conditions of the suspended judgment and thus, properly, in ef
Contrary to the parents’ further contentions, under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that a separate dispositional hearing was not required before terminating their parental rights. The Family Court may enforce a suspended judgment without the need for a separate dispositional hearing, particularly where, as here, the court has presided over prior proceedings from which it became acquainted with the parties, and the record shows that the court was aware of and considered the child‘s best interests (see Matter of Timmia S. [Timmie S.], 111 AD3d 838 [2013]; Matter of Antoinne T. [April T.], 83 AD3d 721 [2011]; Matter of Ayame O.-M., 63 AD3d 1069, 1071 [2009]; Matter of Darren V., 61 AD3d 986, 988 [2009]; Matter of Christyn Ann D., 26 AD3d 491, 493 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.