In re Nicholas S.
In a proceeding pursuant to
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Westchester County Department of Social Services (hereinafter the County) filed a petition against the mother, alleging
In a subsequent order of disposition dated June 26, 2009, the Family Court, upon finding that the mother violated the terms of the order of disposition of March 24, 2008, that the child was a permanently neglected child, and that the best interests of the child required that the mother’s parental rights be terminated and the child be freed for adoption, terminated the mother’s parental rights, freed the child for adoption, and transferred custody of the child to the Westchester County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption. The mother appeals.
“The Family Court may revoke a suspended judgment after a violation hearing if it finds, upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the parent failed to comply with one or more of its conditions” (Matter of Ricky Joseph V., 24 AD3d 683, 684 [2005]; see Matter of Aaron S., 15 AD3d 585, 586 [2005]; Matter of Gerald M., 112 AD2d 6 [1985]). Here, the Family Court properly found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the mother had failed to comply with three of the conditions of the suspended judgment, and it thus properly granted the petition to revoke the suspended judgment and terminate the mother’s parental rights.
At a dispositional hearing after a finding of permanent neglect, the Family Court must make its determination based upon the best interests of the child (see
The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit.
Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Santucci and Leventhal, JJ., concur.