In re Joseph A.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The visitation order that is the subject of this appeal has been superseded by a subsequent visitation order dated May 27, 2010, from which no appeal has been taken. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic (see Matter of Aniyah Mc. [Ann Marie Mc.], 69 AD3d 729, 730 [2010]; Matter of Tishauna Patricia N. [Tee Tee Ann W.], 68 AD3d 1119, 1119-1120 [2009]; Matter of Damian M., 41 AD3d 600 [2007]; Matter of Jahkayia M., of 48 AD3d 393, 394 [2008]; Matter of Briggs v Porter, 284 AD2d 455, 456 [2001]; see also Bubbins v Bubbins, 114 AD2d 346, 346 [1985]).
The mother‘s remaining contentions are not properly before this Court, as they raise issues not determined by the order appealed from (see Matter of Tishauna Patricia N. [Tee Tee Ann W.], 68 AD3d at 1119-1120; see generally Thompson v Leben Home for Adults, 39 AD3d 624, 626 [2007]; Grossman v Amalgamated Warbasse Houses, Inc., 21 AD3d 448 [2005]).
Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Eng and Lott, JJ., concur.