Duffy v. FischerDuffy v. Fischer
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the positive urinalysis test results and related documentation, as well as the testimony of the correction officer who obtained the urine sample from the hospital nurse and tested it, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Geraci v Fischer, 63 AD3d 1467, 1468 [2009]; Matter of Smith v Dubray, 58 AD3d 968, 968 [2009]). Notably, petitioner did not present any proof to substantiate his assertions that the urine sample was contaminated or that the catheter bag contained a leak. Moreover, we have considered petitioner‘s claims regarding alleged violations of
Peters, J.P., Spain, Rose, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.