Burr v. FischerBurr v. Fischer
The misbehavior report and testimony at the disciplinary hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner guilty of harassment, refusing a direct order and making threats (see Matter of Harrington v Prack, 91 AD3d 1244, 1245 [2012]; Matter of Sweet v Woods, 60 AD3d 1183 [2009]). Petitioner‘s contention that there is no evidence regarding any threats is belied by the detailed misbehavior report, which sets forth the language that petitioner directed toward the correction officer involved in the incident.
Turning to petitioner‘s procedural challenges, the record reflects that the hearing was timely commenced in view of petitioner‘s keeplock status at the time the misbehavior report was issued (see
Petitioner‘s remaining contentions, including that the Hearing Officer should have recused himself and his challenge to the punishment imposed, are either unpreserved for our review or without merit.
Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.