Sweet v. R. WoodsSweet v. R. Woods
After an incident arising out of petitioner‘s insistence that there was a problem with his food, he was charged in a misbehavior report with refusing a direct order, making threats and creating a disturbance. At the conclusion of the ensuing tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting this
We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and videotape depicting the incident in question (see Matter of McEachin v Napoli, 56 AD3d 1089, 1089 [2008]). Petitioner‘s assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased is neither substantiated by the record nor is there any indication that the determination in issue flowed from any purported bias (see Matter of Randolph v Napoli, 56 AD3d 832, 833 [2008]). We have
Peters, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.