History
  • No items yet
midpage
Battle v. Hambrick
1914 Ga. LEXIS 555
Ga.
1914
Check Treatment
Evans, P. J.

A plaintiff in attachment demurred to the defendant’s answer to the declaration filed in that proceeding. The court overruled the demurrer. The only ruling-complained of in the bill of exceptions being the overruling of the demurrer to the plea, and no final judgment appear*808ing to have been rendered in the attachment case, this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error. Continental National Bank v. Folsom, 70 Ga. 728; McLendon v. Western & Atlantic Railroad Co., 85 Ga. 129 (11 S. E. 580); Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 (36 S. E. 76); United Glass Co. v. McConnell, 110 Ga. 616 (36 S. E. 58); Vaughn v. Milner, 121 Ga. 436 (49 S. E. 287); Fugazsi v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 (46 S. E. 831).

December 16, 1914. Attachment; from Colquitt superior court. Pctrlcer & Dowling, for plaintiff. Covington & Summerlin, for defendant.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Battle v. Hambrick
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 16, 1914
Citation: 1914 Ga. LEXIS 555
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.