480 Associates, Inc. v. S.A. II, LLC480 Associates, Inc. v. S.A. II, LLC
The verdict was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence that defendant exercised control of a car (see People v Roby, 39 NY2d 69 [1976]), and did so with knowledge that he lacked consent of the owner (see Matter of Raquel M., 99 NY2d 92 [2002]).
The court properly denied defendant‘s motion to suppress his statement to the arresting officers. Miranda warnings were not required since defendant was not subject to custodial interrogation (see People v Huffman, 41 NY2d 29, 33-34 [1976]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.