History
  • No items yet
midpage
510 S.W.3d 41
Tex. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Dispute over a fence along a runway taxiway separating Golding/MacIvor land and adjacent acres within the Zuehl Flying Community.
  • The subdivision’s roads, including the taxiway, were labeled Lot 119 and allegedly either public or easement-accessible.
  • Declaration restrictions prohibited fencing within 10 feet of the taxiway and authorized fence construction only within covenants, not to block access.
  • In 2012, the parties reached an agreed partial summary judgment addressing merits and left fee/sanction issues for later resolution.
  • In 2014 the association sought sanctions against Golding for misstatements; the court imposed sanctions and denied attorney’s fees to landowners; the appellate court reversed in part and remanded.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Attorney’s fees under section 5.006 Landowners prevailed via settlement; court should award fees No prevailing party since merits resolved by agreement; no fees warranted Landowners prevail; fee award remanded for amount determination
Sanctions against Golding Sanctions warranted for bad-faith misrepresentations Sanctions improper in amount and scope; not tied to sanctionable conduct Sanctions improper in amount; remand for proper determination

Key Cases Cited

  • Intercontinental Group Partnership v. KB Home Lone Star L.P., 295 S.W.3d 650 (Tex. 2009) (defines prevailing party status by comparable relief via settlement or decree)
  • Farrar v. Hobby, 506 U.S. 103 (U.S. 1992) (prevailing party requires relief altering legal relationship)
  • KB Home v. Intercontinental Group Partnership, 295 S.W.3d 650 (Tex. 2009) (TX Supreme Court applying Farrar precedent to fees for prevailing party status)
  • Epps v. Fowler, 351 S.W.3d 862 (Tex. 2011) (settlement or dismissal can confer prevailing-party status)
  • Jakab v. Gran Villa Townhouses Homeowners Ass’n, Inc., 149 S.W.3d 863 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2004) (illustrates prevailing-party concepts in fee-shifting context)
  • Inwood N. Homeowners’ Ass’n, Inc. v. Meier, 625 S.W.2d 742 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1981) (standard for fee award considerations under section 5.006)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Zuehl Land Development, LLC, Dorothy Golding and Diane Wiemann v. Zuehl Airport Flying Community Owners Association, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 21, 2015
Citations: 510 S.W.3d 41; 2015 WL 1827570; 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 3979; NO. 01-14-00562-CV
Docket Number: NO. 01-14-00562-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
Log In
    Zuehl Land Development, LLC, Dorothy Golding and Diane Wiemann v. Zuehl Airport Flying Community Owners Association, Inc., 510 S.W.3d 41