History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. Court Services & Offender Supervision Agency
772 F. Supp. 2d 186
D.D.C.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Pro se plaintiff Williams sues CSOSA and several officials alleging Title VII sex discrimination and retaliation.
  • Williams’ MSPB appeal followed termination; MSPB administrative judge affirmed, full MSPB board denied June 20, 2008.
  • Final MSPB order advised Williams he could file suit in district court within 30 days under 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b).
  • Williams received the denial allegedly on June 27, 2008; he filed an improper July 28, 2008 complaint and a petition to proceed IFP, denied August 5, 2008.
  • Williams filed a proper complaint on September 4, 2008 and paid the filing fee on September 5, 2008.
  • Defendants moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to timely file, arguing untimeliness with no equitable tolling warranted.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the § 7703(b)(2) filing period is timely for a mixed-case MSPB appeal. Williams contends timely under §7703(b). Defendants argue untimely filing. Untimely under statute; no tolling found.
Whether equitable tolling applies to save Williams’ late filing. Williams asserts diligence and notice justify tolling. Defendants argue lack of diligence and no prejudice. No equitable tolling; untimely filing stands.
What is the effect of notice receipt timing on the tolling analysis? Plaintiff claims receipt on June 27, 2008. Court finds receipt date unclear; presumes August 8 receipt for tolling. Tolling period resumed August 8, 2008 and expired August 11, 2008; filing still untimely.

Key Cases Cited

  • King v. Dole, 782 F.2d 274 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (30-day period not subject to equitable tolling under § 7703(b)(2))
  • Irwin v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 493 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court 1990) (federal timeliness deadlines presumed subject to equitable tolling)
  • Baker v. Henderson, 150 F. Supp. 2d 17 (D.D.C. 2001) (equitable tolling where clerk’s delay prejudiced defendant; diligent filing shown)
  • Cox v. Consol. Rail Corp., 557 F. Supp. 1261 (D.D.C. 1983) (timeliness tolled where defective filing and timely notice to defendant)
  • Wilkins v. Daley, 49 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 1999) (pro se plaintiff must show diligence to invoke tolling)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Court Services & Offender Supervision Agency
Court Name: District Court, District of Columbia
Date Published: Mar 25, 2011
Citation: 772 F. Supp. 2d 186
Docket Number: Civil Action 08-1538 (RWR)
Court Abbreviation: D.D.C.