937 F. Supp. 2d 41
D.D.C.2013Background
- Pro se plaintiff Linwood A. Williams, Jr. sues CSOSA and three agency officials alleging sex discrimination and retaliation under Title VII.
- Plaintiff renews a motion for appointment of counsel and moves for sanctions against CSOSA; both motions will be denied.
- The case follows an MSPB termination decision upheld on review; Williams previously sought IFP status (granted) but counsel appointment denied.
- The court has ruled on Williams’ IFP and appointment motions in prior orders; the current decision denies renewed appointment of counsel and sanctions.
- Discovery issues arise; the court notes Williams’ delays contributed to discovery problems and finds no basis for sanctions against CSOSA.
- The memorandum closes with an order denying Williams’ renewed motions and directing dismissal of those requests.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether counsel should be appointed for Williams | Williams argues appointment is warranted due to inability to retain counsel | Court previously found case straightforward and Williams capable of representing himself | Denied |
| Whether sanctions should be imposed on CSOSA | CSOSA failed to preserve documents and delayed discovery; seeks substantial sanctions | Record shows no evidence of withholding; Williams caused discovery delays | Denied |
Key Cases Cited
- Shepherd v. Am. Broad. Cos., Inc., 62 F.3d 1469 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (sanctions standard; burden on movant for sanctions)