History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wilder-Newland v. Kessinger
967 N.E.2d 558
| Ind. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Grandmother petitioned to establish visitation with her grandchildren after Father's visitation ended post-incident and conviction.
  • Mother and Father divorced in 2010; custody remained with Mother; dissolution decree did not resolve grandparent visitation.
  • Trial court held a hearing in July 2011 and denied grandparent visitation with explicit findings of fact and conclusions of law favoring Mother’s decision.
  • Findings included that Mother voiced concerns about the children’s adjustment, health risks, and potential contact with Father; Grandmother had limited or no contact since April 2011.
  • Trial court concluded there was no evidence Mother was an unfit parent and gave special weight to Mother's position against court-ordered visitation.
  • Appeal reviewed under two-tiered clear-error standard; appellate court affirmed the denial of visitation, reaffirming the primacy of the children's best interests and the fit parent's decision.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court clearly erred in denying grandparent visitation Wilder-Newland contends the court should grant some visitation or rehear reconsideration Kessinger asserts Mother’s fitness and opposition to visitation justify denial Affirmed; denial supported by best interest findings

Key Cases Cited

  • Crafton v. Gibson, 752 N.E.2d 78 (Ind.Ct.App.2001) (fit parent's decision entitled to special weight in grandparent visitation)
  • Megyese v. Woods, 808 N.E.2d 1208 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (presumption in favor of a fit parent's decision; court may award visitation only if in child's best interest)
  • Spaulding v. Williams, 793 N.E.2d 252 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (presumption and weight to parent's decision in grandparent visitation matters)
  • Mitchell v. Mitchell, 695 N.E.2d 920 (Ind.1998) (where special findings exist, court may affirm on any legal theory supported by the findings)
  • Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (S. Ct. 2000) (parental rights have a fundamental role in determining visitation)
  • MacLafferty v. MacLafferty, 829 N.E.2d 938 (Ind.2005) (deference to trial court discretion in family law, with standard of review for clear error)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Wilder-Newland v. Kessinger
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 17, 2012
Citation: 967 N.E.2d 558
Docket Number: 40A01-1109-DR-395
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.